Q: I was shocked to
see the First Lady being sworn in to the United States Senate wearing
a sky blue pants suit. Shouldn't it at least have been black or
dark blue? When are skirts coming back? Please predict SOON.
A:
As Hillary said in her acceptance speech, her campaign wore
out lots of volunteers and six black pants suits -- apparently her
default outfit when she's acting on her own as an independent professional.
Maybe back in Washington -- where, remember, besides being a Senator
from New York she would also be First Lady until Inauguration Day
-- she felt obliged to get back into the traditional I'm-just-a-harmless-wife
pastels.
You're shocked because you're applying the male color standard
in which darker colors are dressier: Formal wear is black, a navy
business suit is more formal than light gray, and a lot more formal
than khakis. But the traditional female color hierarchy works the
other way: Fragile wear-it-once-and-send-it-to-the-cleaners pastels
are ceremonial wifewear; practical dark colors that are less likely
to smudge and spot are what you wear to work.
Why the difference? It goes back to a time when upper-class men
had to be able to deal with urban grime while upper-class women,
in order to demonstrate their husbands' success, were obliged to
stay home and engage in conspicuous idleness -- do embroidery, pop
bonbons, and never get their pretty dresses dirty.
As for skirts v. pants, you'd wear pants, too, if zillions of journalists
had complained you had fat legs.
Patricia
McLaughlin is a nationally syndicated fashion columnist.
Read more of Patsy's answers.
|